Home

Advertisement

mojave_wolf [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
mojave_wolf

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Happy Birthday, Redcandle17! [Jul. 5th, 2009|09:48 pm]
It's still technically Sunday where I'm at, but after midnight where you are, so just in case I get too busy tomorrow . . .

Hope you have a wonderful day and a fantastic year!
linkpost comment

Happy birthday Papa Nook! [Jul. 3rd, 2009|07:57 am]
One day late because I thought this was the second, but hopefully not a dollar short, I'm wishing a very happy 102 to Papa Nook!

Oh, wait, he's not *that* old.

Seriously, happy birthday, dude, and hope you had a great day yesterday, a great weekend and a great next year!

(and for those of you on my f-list who are into reading about the environment and animals for lots of great stroies and photos, or if your politics are squarely to the left of mine, I strongly recommend his lj to you)
link2 comments|post comment

Things to direct your attention to . . . [Jun. 29th, 2009|07:02 pm]
These are both at blogs I've linked to before, but Corrente is really my favorite place to go as an all round news source these days (I had been gradually saving up posts to link to and it was around 20 that had been sitting in my tabs for days before I finally gave up and turned off the computer this weekend), and when the Apostate is "on", her pull no punches style quite suits my temperament.


(1) Failureship!

A great discussion (a good post, but a great discussion that really hits its stride around midway:

http://www.correntewire.com/lack_liberal_strength_or_failureship

(I just refreshed and it gets a bit sidetracked at one point, but it's a huge thread and most of it is really well worth reading; I'm not quoting cause there are so many places to quote from)

(also, there's an older one that is quite disturbing about the NSA somehow getting a hold of Bill Clinton's private e-mails)

(2) http://apostate.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/intersectionality-is-silly/#comments (which as an aside linked to an excellent environmentally friendly post of hers which managed to attract one of the most disgusting trolls of all time in the comment threads) (and I know at least a couple of people who at least used to read me are all yay intersectionality!, and I'll agree there's some deliberate oversimplification here, and clearly most oppressions are based on some sort of xenophobia and/or corrupt power dynamics--make that arguably corrupt for the libertarians amongst you, but seriously, this is frequently beside the point, which is her point, and a good point it is, and I shall now refrain from saying "stick them with the pointy end" as that is really only extremely tangentially related--anyway, short, fun, pointy, well written post).

I don't love everything at either place, in fact many people at corrente are horrified with each other on occasion, and the Apostate annoyed me quite a bit even while (sort of) taking my side in the feminist age wars, declaring that over-40 feminists are wonderful mother figures. Now, for me, that would be "father figure" which makes me think of the George Michael song which gets into a whole different set of issues, but nonetheless, this was disturbing.

I mention this as a springboard to my own discussion of this: It's interesting that lately ageism seems to be *worst* in highly political liberal circles, see: last year's election, & more recently the NOW elections. Totally fucked up that apparently the majority of feminists are more ageist in pretty much every sense of the word than the Coachella Valley (Palm Springs & surrounding cities) hard rock station, who ran a "Who's the hottest MILF?" contest a couple of months ago. Not otherwise endorsing this contest, mind you, but I find that mindset better than, say, the one recently expressed on Jezebel, I have to say, and not just because I'm apparently now in what young liberals consider the ancient and decrepit crowd.

GQ, not the most liberal of magazines, but a year or so ago they have Helen Mirren on the cover saying "Woo! Still hot!" Meanwhile the DKos crowd is, also a year or so ago, yipping about the "dry pussy brigade", When did this shit start happening? When I was a freshman at Georgetown, we had Dynasty parties, and yes, I'm dating myself, but it was universally considered that Joan Collins was hot. And when Playboy came out with a pictorial that was more or less "Joan Collins naked, past and present", we were all somewhat surprised but not horrified or in denial that 50-something Joan was at least as cute, if not cuter, than 20-40 something Joan. (Feel free to tell me why I should not be, even at 18, looking at such pictures. It's a legit argument. )

Meanwhile, a lot of feminists on both sides of the recent argument refer to over 40 women as being "invisibled", and some of the stupider (and I mean, you *have* to be stupid to make this argument, I'don't give a shit if you IQ tested 200 somehow) ones, including some really stupid ones already in their 30's, seem to think this is a good thing and the over 40 crowd needs to hurry up and hide somewhere and quit appearing in public or yanno, talking.

And, um, when did over 40 become the demarcation for "old"? It used to be more like 50 or 60 back in the olden days, when I was getting arthritic and some of you were not yet conceived, and people are healthier and aging better physically now than they were back then (and even back then, we recognized that some "old" people weren't that old, and were amazingly capable compared to us whippersnappers). Hell, I just turned 44 and am *more* interesting and way cooler in most ways than when I was 18.

So, in essence, guys w/no feminist consciousness and not even necessarily politically liberal, whether past or present-- open-minded and cool on the subject of older women. Present day feminists and the more obnoxious liberal activists under 35 -- deeply split on whether older women still have reason to exist beyond serving as elder statespeople and advisors, solidly together that hotness ends at 40?

Something wrong here.
link10 comments|post comment

If it's not fixed then it must be broken. [Jun. 27th, 2009|09:26 am]
I have far too many very different things to do today, and there is no way I'm going to complete a quarter of what I would like to or all of what I really need to.

Therefore, I am going back to sleep.

ps--has anyone read Caitlin Kiernan's Low Red Moon? Sasha very much liked the story "The Dead and the Moonstruck", featuring a character named Starling Jane, as a child. Author's note at end of book "Gothic! Ten Original Dark Tales" mentions SJ was originally a teenager in LRM. Having read one (very good, highly recommended) book by CK, I am unsure of Sasha will like CK's novels. I would not ask but our library system apparently has every book ever written by Kiernan *except* Low Red Moon, and we are not really able to afford it anyway, so . . . umm, this is probably pointless. I haven't gotten enough sleep a single night this week. See original part of post.

pps-- the one I have read is threshold. of the others (aside from LRM), I most inclined toward Daughter of Hounds based purely on title. Any Kiernan fans wish to chime in on this or others?
link4 comments|post comment

Since you won't send me cyanide, how 'bout this? [Jun. 25th, 2009|09:30 am]
I've mentioned before we're setting up our own business. We have the name and logo and tagline, and hopefully the rest of the stuff by the end of the weekend. (should've had already but for my sloth and inability to focus/inability to do many completely different things during the day/general incompetence) as things like name and logo and tagline were all from Sasha, and a fucking cool logo she designed).

But, we are nearly there. Now, we need a cheap or discount web-hosting plan, that is nonetheless very reliable (Ideally, 99.9%+ uptime).

We see all sorts of sites and plans out there, but we are looking for feedback from people who have actually tried these plans, or know people who have. I am equally interested in positive and negative experiences.

I know a couple of you have your own domain and one of you recently started your own site (if you are at all in to tattoos and cool animal pix, esp. birds and tortoises,and don't mind occasional .expressive language, check out Carrie's www.beercanhill.com ), so, anyhow . . .

You can post here, or e-mail me or send me an lj-message w/comments. Either is cool.

Thanx!

eta Anyone know anything about WebHostingPad ?
link13 comments|post comment

Transcendentalism & Horror [Jun. 20th, 2009|09:59 am]
" . . . this is one incredible world to explore. Never have I experienced a place where this world and the dream world are so close, and the veil between them so transparent. I continue to be awed and intrigued . . . " -- Steve Brown, his "Dry Heat" column in the June/July 2009 issue of The Sun Runner, a local magazine.

It's funny that I just picked this up and read it the other day, because it gets to the heart of a big part of why I love it here so much. And it is a consistent theme of transcendentalists everywhere -- from pre-Brit Australian culture to most of the Romantic poets to Whitman & Thoreau & Kerouac and a whole bunch of others in American writing. But this same theme was also key to the horror scripts I was writing and the Blackwood story "The Willows" and Machen's "The Great God Pan" that I read to put myself in the right frame of mind for it, and is crucial to a lot (nearly all?) of the best cosmic horror (as opposed to psychological horror, or any other sort of horror). Whether we're talking Lovecraft or King (most scarily in Pet Semetary) or Ramsey Campbell (anyone else remember The Nameless or The Incarnate?) and a lot of the scariest filmic horror. And Peter Straub sort of combined the two into one, which was probably why he was my favorite writer in the 80's, and the same combo attracted me to Coleridge as a little kid (though he seemed pretty definitely down on the transcendant side of the line).

Both sets of stories, the joyous and the scare-you-silly, start with the premise (which I think pretty much everyone accepts on some level, whether scientific or spiritual or both) that what we actually see is just the tip of the iceberg. In transcendentalism, there's beauty and passion and adventure just waiting if we can penetrate those veils and perceive more of reality (and in the meantime, these things are all still there in this reality if we just look at it right). In horror, there's darkness and thingies waiting , and you really better hope they don't notice you looking, or else that you can cut the connection before they use it to reel you in or, worse for the rest of world, insinuate themselves into our reality (which, if you look at it right, still has all these things without any need for veil-piercing, but in cosmic horror the worst case scenarios get even worse).

One of the reasons I don't read horror much anymore is that the transcendentalist view pretty much won out in my psyche. It's really strange, to me, that people can look around out here and get creeped out. If there are spirits here, they seem the sortwhich caress in passing and invite you to dance on the winds (which is perhaps one reason no great writers of cosmic horror lived or grew up in the desert, as far as I'm aware).

But now that I'm trying to write it again, I'm sort of working at viewing other levels of reality in the way I view this one -- lots of beauty, but lots of awful cruelty, and lots of misleading surfaces. And no reason highly sentient spiritual creatures should be any less split in their traits than we are, or more like spiders that don't really care about us one way or another except as a potential food source. In most spiritual traditions we grow up thinking of spirituality in terms of salvation and goodness, but no reason why those can't exist side by side with their converse, or why anywhere else should be more fair than here. A little kid never hearing of snakes sees the beautiful shiny green patterned sinuous snake and pets its, gets bitten and dies. Go exploring in one cave, see the pretty waterfall. Go exploring in another and the ground gives way and you fall and break your spine and spend your last few days lying paralyzed in total darkness and maybe some of the local small fauna begin slowly eating you while you die. and you can't do a damn thing but lie there at a broken angle experiencing pain and terror. Enter one unknown door in a city, and you're in the coolest club of your life and meet the dance partner of your dreams and have wonderful adventures happily ever after. Enter the next one down and some crime bosses torture you to find out why you were trying to spy on them, and no matter what you tell them the end result is death, unless you can get away (and that could be a nice story, especially if you got away and they followed you)(and of course you and the dance partner of your dreams could also wind up involved w/some sort of dangerous conspiracy, which is another story right there, and all of this is probably more marketable than moving to the desert and experiencing rapture looking at the stars and spiritual bliss petting creosote bushes in the swirling wind).

So, no reason for these things to be incompatible at all, yet I find it interestingly incongruent that the most frightening horror stories and the most uplifting spiritual transcendence both consist of finding where the veil 'tween realities is weakest and exchanging energy between the two sides.
link4 comments|post comment

What I did this weekend . . . plus two quickie short story reviews [Jun. 15th, 2009|08:52 am]
(1) Three screenplay ideas sent out. More than the pitch they had asked for, less than the full treatments I had planned. Whether this goes through or not . . .

Yay! I am writing fiction again and following through on it! I like all these ideas and plan to keep working on them; also plan to send the production company some more later this week. Had planned to get 9-12 fully plotted concepts and pick the best 3-6. As it turns out, I only had 3 fully plotted concepts, so that's what went (one of them was basically two stories in one, as at about the 1/5 of the way in mark, I had choose where to go with plot, and have either a supernatural or non-supernatural explanation; I prefer the supernatural but wasn't fully happy w/how that worked out so leaving the other option in, too). And another of the concepts I personally very much like but will almost certainly be too expensive for them to film. And one idea I think is truly awesome and affordable and great and wonderful and will scare people shitless if they do it right and they'd better fucking buy it, dammit!!!
(any of you who I know well enough to trust and want to see broad outlines of this, just ask; I don't have finished script yet)

Also, since I turned these in late (there was no deadline and they told me I had plenty of time when I asked, but I think I was about a week later than I should have been, since the people I'm competing against already had workable ideas and turned them in right away and I had to come up w/stuff from scratch) I thought I needed an extra hook so left the ending out of all of them, hoping this will provide extra enticement. In retrospect, I'm wondering if that was a completely stupid idea and I just shot myself. Or if they had already decided on someone else and just hadn't told me cause for all they knew I was *never* going to finish these. Or maybe I will soon be getting a cal/e-mail saying "we want to give you money and shoot your film!"

Also plan to keep working on the other ideas that I hadn't finished. Huh, and here I thought I was permanently away from horror.

(note: for inspiration, I last week read two classic stories I had always wanted to read but never got around to, Algernon Blackwood's "The Willows" and Arthur Machen's "The Great God Pan," because I wanted to get a particular effect but didn't want to read anything contemporary so as not to inadvertantly get too influenced by what other people are doing now. I strongly recommend "The Willows" to everyone who likes subtle horror that scares the hell out of you in a really great, non-blood all over the place way. Really beautifully done and evocative, even if I had some trouble getting as scared as I maybe should've because the terror here came from a transcendental view of nature I normally find exhilarating and inspirational, not scary. By the end still managed to share in the narrator's emotions, however. Also, great nature/travel writing story. Seriously.

The Machen story . . . well written and worth reading, but the two greatest horrors of this story were (1)something that one human did to another at the beginning, and (2)that I didn't get the idea the author *thought* that was the greatest horror of the story. Also interesting to see the 1894 connection between evil and sexual "depravity", i.e. "perversions" that I strongly suspect would have a lot of overlap with what is considered normal kinkiness these days, though everything was vague enough that I suppose there could have been something awful going on. And I was really concerned the author didn't think the true monster of the story was the fuckwad doctor. Ah well, glad I finally read this, nonetheless.

These two stories, I'm almost certain, provided a great deal of the basis for the best of Lovecraft, Ramsey Campbell (I still say his 80's stuff is the scariest I've ever read by anyone, excepting maybe Pet Sematary), Straub, King and (based on the one book I read by her last year) Caitlin Kiernan. Hopefully I will get equally good mileage out of them.)

(2) Working on starting business w/Sasha. Our last one was a moderate success until various health issues combined with a forced move and staying in a hotel forever due to not being able to find an okay place for our dogs derailed it a few years back, I hope this will be even better. Have made fair amount of headway and hope to be up and running by end of week.

(3) Wrote draft of business plan/loan proposal for friends, who gave me a whole $25 to do it. I told them I didn't have time and this would be a bigger undertaking than they thought, but they assured me it would be easy (then why aren't you doing it yourself? Sheesh) and they could wait until I had time (they gave me the $25 last monday) and begged and said I was their only hope, and I need the money, so they have a good faith effort of the best I could do in about three hours, not counting the hour or so discussing it and the multiple back and forth e-mails from me trying to get them to give me financial projections and what sort of return how fast the loan officer would want and them telling me that was part of what they needed me for, to come up with this. Again, sheesh. I feel simultaneously guilty for taking the money when I think they have very little hope of getting this loan and there's no way anything resembling $25 gets the sort of effort it would take me to do this right, which I tried to tell them, and I'm also annoyed with myself for doing even that much work that cheaply. I sent them a draft telling them I was happy to plug in different numbers or say different things if they wanted, and they so far haven't even caught things *I* think need fixing (and have fixed on my computer) but was just not willing to spend any more effort on, so . . . .

This week:
Follow up on and pray I get the grant writing job,
Finish setting up the me/Sasha biz
Maybe apply for this data entry job someone told me about that would, at least, be better than nothing, while awaiting better
Keep working on script ideas and maybe re-start my last novel idea.
Maybe call and make sure the census thing is still restarting in July and that I'm still wanted.
Maybe start pushing my tutoring services more.

Glad the fic/script writing is going again, after so long that it wasn't. And the biz w/Sasha. I'm really excited about both (and will be equally so about the grant writing spot if I get it, just because yay money and survival and full time well-paying permanent job with health benefits).
link4 comments|post comment

DOMA, vomit, media fools, hypocrisy and elections [Jun. 14th, 2009|11:12 pm]
I'm really surprised more people haven't commented on the Obama administration's defense of DOMA. It's not so much a shock that he went back on various highly public pledges to overturn this, that's pretty much par for the course, but the particular way in which he did it. Clearly, I'm not a fan of his, but this shocked me. Seriously, shocked. I think the far and away best coverage of this particular legal briefing was here:

http://solarbird.livejournal.com/840728.html

Highlights:
It argues for every social-conservative and right-wing talking point . . .
Add in explicit references to Christianity and it could be a Focus on the Family brief.
the pledge made by Senator Obama to work to repeal DOMA has been yanked from the White House website.
People who like to talk about framing should be aware that this now frames the "liberal" position as being exactly the same as the "conservative" position on this issue.


To quote Avedon,
I was reading a thread earlier where someone responded to complaints about the Democratic leadership by asking, "Do you want the Republicans to still be in charge of everything?" And the thing is, I think they still are - everything, including the Democratic Party.

Three points here: (1) Seriously, what the fuck difference does it make for the Dems to be in charge if they actually accomplish more badness than the Repubs would have been able to? Answer: It would be better if they weren't. (2) They didn't have to compromise this year. Any of the top dems would have won last year, and they could have won it running on the Kucinich platform instead of the Blue-Dog-modified-by slight-concessions-to Hillary-so-she-would-haul-in her-supporters-for-them. (3) Most crucial to Avedon's conclusion: Obama is hugely popular. The majority of the public is desperate and terrified and willing to follow him in vaguely credible place he goes, or, apparently, any truly horrific not remotely credible place he goes, based on results so far. He has nearly the fanatic cult-like devotion that Bush had post-9/11. Anything Obama does at this point is because he chooses to do it. He is governing like an authoritarian socially conservative technocrat because that's how he wants to govern. One is reminded of the oft-repeated story of his former law school roomie's surprise that Obama had chosen to run as a Democrat, not a Republican, given that Obama's beliefs meshed much more closely to that of the GOP.

Re: The Letterman/Palin flap. Violet has gotten most of the attention (and she deserves it, much as I'm horrified by several people in a comment thread who are defending abstinence only education), but Octagolore has an excellent and much deserving to be read post on the subject over here: http://octogalore.blogspot.com/2009/06/i-read-excellent-article-in-salons.html I especially like the finale of her critique of two otherwise excellent articles:

So basically, the fact that misogyny is wrong period end of story isn’t quite enough. To really convince the audience, it needs to be argued that “if we allow our dudes to be mean to those other women, they will start being mean to us!”

Up until this point, both articles were making feminist arguments. Misogyny is wrong. How hard is that?

But then, back to junior high. Here’s how it might affect me. Or people like me. People who count.


And last but hardly least, the Iranian elections were troubling, but the reaction of the Iranian people is heartening. If only liberals and progressives in this country were remotely as concerned about fairness in electoral outcomes of Presidential elections, there having been notable timidity in the general elections of 2000 and 2004, and the the Democratic primary of 2008, in each of which cases the possibly (2004) or certainly (2000 and 2008) screwed over loser basically ceded the contest for fear of looking like a sore loser, to great popular acclaim from the people in 2000 and 2008. And we saw and are seeing where that gets us . . . so, to the people of Iran who aren't such easily cowed and manipulated herd animals as the general populace of the US seems to be, I salute you!
link9 comments|post comment

I shoulda been writing but this was too funny [Jun. 11th, 2009|09:56 pm]
This blog post is *hilarious*.

http://apostate.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/escaping-a-pick-up-artist/#comments

Perhaps even moreso are some of the comments.

Best insult I've read in a while:

Kathy, do you ever wonder what life would be like if you’d had enough oxygen at birth?

Along w/the suggestion that women should tell men bugging them at streetfairs "I'm a scientologist!"

this just amused me.

=)
link2 comments|post comment

Okay, one more . . . [Jun. 10th, 2009|07:26 pm]
http://www.correntewire.com/which_method_contacting_your_congress_critter_best

Detailed response to survey of congressional staffers about what is most effective way to contact/lobby your congressperson . . .

worth reading if you intend to do that sort of thing any time soon
linkpost comment

Possibly my last post, probably last poli post, for acouple of days [Jun. 10th, 2009|09:49 am]
Because I really must get back to screenwriting, even though I'm probably already running too late and all is doomed, and even if I'm not we shall probably run out money before I get paid for anything or the new job starts even if I get it so my efforts will pay off sometime after they find my dessicated corpse . . .

but this is important, so. . .

For those of you interested in health care reform, and I know some of you have an immediate personal interest, Corrente really is the blog to be.

For a couple of examples, just from what is on the front page this morning . . .

http://www.correntewire.com/shorter_newshour_give_peasants_you_have_no_power#comment-143997
http://www.correntewire.com/last_taboo_health_care_debate_abolishing_profit
http://www.correntewire.com/youre_already_paying_healthcare_you_deserve_get_it
http://www.correntewire.com/action_alert_demonstrate_wash_dc_june_25#new
link4 comments|post comment

Go see! [Jun. 10th, 2009|09:11 am]
Entrepreneurial dolphin!

Wheeeee!


http://papananook.livejournal.com/459863.html
linkpost comment

Ah, I take it all back! [Jun. 9th, 2009|10:43 pm]
Some of Obama's appointments are really terrific. See here!

http://www.correntewire.com/obama_rewards_att_warrantless_surveillance_ceo_ed_whitacre_chairmanship_gm

Thank gawd -- or the 11 dimensional chess player -- that FISA [cough] reform gave the telcos retroactive immunity! Because otherwise Ed Whitacre, 17-year AT&T Chairman and CEO, would be in jail -- since FISA violations were felonies, back when we had the rule of law -- instead of being tapped to run GM!

Of course, Lambert may be on to something w/the "thank *God*" reference, as witness here:

http://www.reclusiveleftist.com/2009/05/08/ive-decided-obama-is-a-messenger-from-god/

It’s like the Carrie Prejean business, she of Miss “opposite marriage” California fame. The most interesting thing about the whole embroglio is that Prejean’s opinion on gay marriage appears to be identical to Obama’s. Observe:

Carrie Prejean: “I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land that you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage and, you know what, in my country and my family I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anyone out there but that’s how I was raised and that’s how I think it should be between a man and a woman.”

Barack Obama: “I’m a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman.”

Yet Carrie Prejean is reviled as a hateful stupid bitch, while Barack Obama is still the Savior Dude emerging from the Willamette River with roses at his feet and a goddamn unicorn prancing behind him.


There are actual pictures both of polar bears and Obama-as-Savior-Rising-From-River at this link.

Also, this is worth reading, along w/the comments (I don't agree w/all of them, but interesting discussion):
http://www.correntewire.com/dear_right_wingers_leave_obama_alone_seriously#new
eta a quote from this: How did anyone get the impression that Obama is something of a prophet who's presiding over anything more threatening to the teabag crowd than Bush's Third Term?
It's time to tell the GOP to chill the fuck out, queue up some William DeVaughn, and be thankful for what they've got.



And yes, as do others, I find the appointment of an anti-choice,*anti-contraceptive* (in my mind, this means you are batshit insane) person to, well, *anything* other than prison toilet cleaner, to be especially offensive -- make that obscene -- in the wake of the Tiller murder. I consider George Tiller and all like him to be heroes, btw, tho I haven't previously said that. My bad for not saying before, but I didn't really have anything to add to what so many were already saying so well.
link2 comments|post comment

oH mY, noT whAt i XpectEd At aLl !#^&*! [Jun. 9th, 2009|02:53 pm]
Stolen from la marquise de, jesastria, and possibly others that I missed

Okay, I sorta expected violent and thought cynical was a possibility, but the other two? Thought I was a shoe-in for low brow traditionalist. Heh. And I've never actually read this writer (tho I did read a review of her that made me want to hit the reviewer, who mostly seems to review things for the purpose of trashing them) (tho I did always want to go back and finish Storm Constantine's Wraethru)

And in keeping w/my violent side, I would suggest not asking me to put this behind an lj cut. To save time, "No."

eta: rowling is my opposite but I quite like the HP books, esp the first 5, and I like Pullman. Liked one book by Wolfe lots (There Are Doors) but another I didn't finish (1st in some acclaimed, award winning fantasy series, my dislike of which probably proves the lie to my highbrow credential here)


Your result for Which fantasy writer are you?...

Mary Gentle (b. 1956)

5 High-Brow, 9 Violent, 3 Experimental and 11 Cynical!

Congratulations! You are High-Brow, Violent, Experimental and Cynical! These concepts are defined below.


Mary Gentle is a UK author whose work has received some acclaim. Her great break-through came with 1984 fantasy novel Golden Witchbreed, which depicts the travels of a UK envoy on a planet, Orthe, where the inhabitants have, by choice, abandoned a high-tech society for a seemingly less advanced way of life. Though nominally science fiction, the novel is generally called fantasy, partly because Orthe has the feel of a fantasy world. Nothing is what it first seems to be on Orthe, however, and the envoy's journey across the planet gradually reveals a vividly imagined alternate society, where nothing is ever over-simplified or, for that matter, easy. Gentle revisited Orthe in 1987, when the sequel Ancient Light was published.


Since then Gentle has written the White Crow sequence, starting with Rats and Gargoyles (1990), which has received some acclaim, not least from other writers; China Miéville, for example, put it on his list of "50 science fiction and fantasy novels socialists should read". She has also written Grunts! (1992), a novel set in a Tolkien-like fantasy world, but told from the point of view of the orcs, as well as several other books.


Gentle is not one to shun away from difficult issues in her works and is equally unafraid of discussing and depicting violence. Neither has she settled to writing the same kind of story over and over, and, while being at her best a great entertainer, she has the ability of twisting and bending fantasy environments and themes at her will, making unafraid a key-word of her career as a writer.



You are also a lot like Gene Wolfe.



If you want something more gentle (no pun intended), try Philip Pullman.



If you'd like a challenge, try your exact opposite, J K Rowling.



Your score


This is how to interpret your score: Your attitudes have been measured on four different scales, called 1) High-Brow vs. Low-Brow, 2) Violent vs. Peaceful, 3) Experimental vs. Traditional and 4) Cynical vs. Romantic. Imagine that when you were born, you were in a state of innocence, a tabula rasa who would have scored zero on each scale. Since then, a number of circumstances (including genetical, cultural and environmental factors) have pushed you towards either end of these scales. If you're at 45 or -45 you would be almost entirely cynical, low-brow or whatever. The closer to zero you are, the less extreme your attitude. However, you should always be more of either (eg more romantic than cynical). Please note that even though High-Brow, Violent, Experimental and Cynical have positive numbers (1 through 45) and their opposites negative numbers (-1 through -45), this doesn't mean that either quality is better. All attitudes have their positive and negative sides, as explained below.


High-Brow vs. Low-Brow


You received 5 points, making you more High-Brow than Low-Brow. Being high-browed in this context refers to being more fascinated with the sort of art that critics and scholars tend to favour, rather than the best-selling kind. At their best, high-brows are cultured, able to appreciate the finer nuances of literature and not content with simplifications. At their worst they are, well, snobs.


Violent vs. Peaceful


You received 9 points, making you more Violent than Peaceful. Please note that violent in this context does not mean that you, personally, are prone to violence. This scale is a measurement of a) if you are tolerant to violence in fiction and b) whether you see violence as a means that can be used to achieve a good end. If you are, and you do, then you are violent as defined here. At their best, violent people are the heroes who don't hesitate to stop the villain threatening innocents by means of a good kick. At their worst, they are the villains themselves.


Experimental vs Traditional


You received 3 points, making you more Experimental than Traditional. Your position on this scale indicates if you're more likely to seek out the new and unexpected or if you are more comfortable with the familiar, especially in regards to culture. Note that traditional as defined here does not equal conservative, in the political sense. At their best, experimental people are the ones who show humanity the way forward. At their worst, they provoke for the sake of provocation only.


Cynical vs Romantic


You received 11 points, making you more Cynical than Romantic. Your position on this scale indicates if you are more likely to be wary, suspicious and skeptical to people around you and the world at large, or if you are more likely to believe in grand schemes, happy endings and the basic goodness of humankind. It is by far the most vaguely defined scale, which is why you'll find the sentence "you are also a lot like x" above. If you feel that your position on this scale is wrong, then you are probably more like author x. At their best, cynical people are able to see through lies and spot crucial flaws in plans and schemes. At their worst, they are overly negative, bringing everybody else down.



Author picture by the talented artist "Molosovsky". Visit http://www.flickr.com/people/25360041@N06/ for more!



Take Which fantasy writer are you?
at HelloQuizzy

link12 comments|post comment

Okay, I have to now . . . [Jun. 9th, 2009|10:46 am]
H/T to Cynethesia:

http://openleft.com/diary/13687/contraception-opponent-appointed-to-hhs

Key quotes:
Obama's appointment of Alexia Kelley, an abortion opponent, to director of the Department of Health and Human Services' Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. . .

Someone who doesn't believe in contraception is being put in charge of $63,082,000 directly intended for HIV/AIDS prevention and family planning in 2009 for the poorest, most medically underserved populations in the country.


I have either lacked the time or the energy to document all the failings of the Obama administration the previous times I was so moved, and don't really now, either, so I won't have the links to other discussions about each of my objections that I would like to, but he is really sucking. No, I don't think McCain would have been much, if any worse. And I'm 100% sure that we'd be better off with an iffily popular Republican president trying to push through all this shit than a highly popular democrat who is labeled "liberal" and "progressive", thereby discrediting all of us when he fails miserably. (He isn't liberal or progressive, he's what used to be known as a country club republican, and not particularly progressive even for that genus, as I tried to tell you people all last year)

Let's see . . . Actually worse than the Bush administration on civil liberties, from spying on citizens to covering up things. Publicly approves of firing gay people from the military for being gay. Continues Bush administration policies on wolves, polar bears and mountain top removal mining. Throws cajillions to extremely rich people on Wall Street to keep them rich without any accountability or oversight or even anyone knoiwng what they are doing with the money, but insists middle class workers take huge pay and benefit cuts to get much smaller bail out sumsl for their companies to continue running in much reduced capacity, does as much as Cheney could ever do to keep single payer health care off the health care reform table (and it seems unlikely that any reform he or the democratic senate leadership let by will be much, if any, of an improvement), already tried to quietly implement a Republican sort of social security "reform" but was stopped by Pelosi, among others, after which unflattering leaks about Pelosi came out (again, shades of the Bush administration), and still keeps pushing Republican memes about social security . . .

Ummm, okay. I take back anything kind I said about him during the first week, and point to when I said that if there were no third party alternatives, I would have voted for McCain, and we would in fact be better off w/McCain because he would face more congressional opposition to his conservatism, and because the rebound effect of a McCain failure would be better than the rebound effect of an Obama failure. Sometimes, I would rather have been wrong. This is one of those times. But I was right.

Obama is an awful, awful president thus far. That he occasionally says nice things does not ameliorate this *at all*.
link6 comments|post comment

Job hunting again . . . [May. 25th, 2009|11:15 am]
[Tags|, , ]
[mood |accomplished]

Well, the whole canvassing thing was successful. The Clean Energy Act made it out of committee, and Mary Bono Mack was the *only* Republican who voted for it.

Thought I would hate that job, but since I actually thought this was a good bill and she genuinely was undecided (apparently leaning against at one point), I wound up really enjoying it.

Given that she *was* the only Republican on the committee to vote for it, I'm inclined to think the thousands of postcards we deluged her with, along with online petition and the probably around 1,000 phone calls, were actually helpful in persuading her that this is something her constituants cared about.

And it paid decent, very decent for the amount of hours worked. On my best day, at the Palm Springs Farmer's Market, I got 75 cards filled out in 3 hours, which tied me for the third best day of anyone w/a very attractive 19 year old named Morgan (who also had the record w/81; second best was this guy who passed them out at all of his college finals one day). I was not the only older person or only person a bit underemployed; there was also an MD who lost her license for practicing homeopathy out there, and I'd say the older/younger than me split was around 55/45, at a guess. All of us older types and all the younger ones I talked to actually believed in what we were doing, and normally avoided this kind of work.

Before I get back to sending out resumes (cause census not re-starting till July and all), I thought it would be fun to detail some of the more interesting responses I got from people when I asked some variation on "wanna help pass a clean energy bill?":

"Global warming is a hoax." / "I don't believe in clean energy" (several people a day w/some variation on those,usually white men)

"The last ten years are the coolest on record since they've been able to measure." (a variant of the above I thought deserved special attention, said twice.)

"This is part of plot. You need to go to (pick a crazy-site). If this goes through they're going to tax us based on how much air we breathe." (several people, including a nice woman at the farmer's market with whom I discussed politics for a few minutes and who for the most part was pretty informed and intelligent despite her genuine belief in this particularly stupid theory.)

"You don't have to worry. I am the Earth and I'm just fine." (A nice young woman wearing green who was 100% sincere.)

"I don't have to do anything. I have faith in Obama." (when told that Obama supports this, tho I honestly have no clue whether he does or not, the following:) "He has power. He doesn't need me." (when mentioned that the bill has to get through the house and the senate for Obama to sign:) "I have faith in Obama. He can make them pass it without me."

"It's already too late. There's no point in trying to do anything." (A truly shocking number of people, not one of whom seemed particularly depressed.)

"Only the private sector can fix this." (several people)

"FUCK OFF!!!!" (an old man slowly moving on a cane, before he even knew why I was approaching him)

"Go away or I'll call the police." (an old woman displaying her cell phone like a talisman, also before I had more than two words out)

"It's all doomed anyway, and the faster the better. There are four horseman, and their names are Famine, Pestilence,War and Death. And they're going to come within 30 years, and we're all going to die, and this is what has to happen because only then can the earth become a paradise again. But first it has to die, and the faster the better." (An old guy who delivered a lecture to me & Morgan when we were working together at the college one very empty Friday)

"This is all pointless, what we need is a revolution." "No, I don't mean protests, I mean bombs." "I can pay you a lot more than you're making now, to help me make bombs." "You won't have to go to jail. You can make sure you don't go to jail by strapping them on." "Oh,I can make sure your family is well taken care of." (Bearded white guy w/an Obama/Biden sticker on his car. I *think* he was just fucking with me in a deadpan voice. I dearly hope so.)


"You're commiting a felony, asking people to sign a political petition outside a post office. I'm going to go inside and tell them . You'd better leave." (A 6'4" heavily muscled white guy w/shaved head, pot belly and nose ring, wearing a white shirt and green kilt.) (the post office employees ignored him.)

"I'm a hardcore conservative, and I don't appreciate you spreading your ideology in front of post office. What you're doing is illegal, and you better leave." (same post office, about 20 minutes after the first guy, about 5'9 but built like a tank. When I more or less laughed at his efforts to intimidate me into leaving, he went inside, and this time a postal employee came out and asked what was up, and tank-man said I was blocking the door and harassing people. Two women (one of whom was also opposed to what I was doing) came over and said big dude was harassing me and I was being nice and polite and even opening the door for people w/packages, all of which was true. Big dude left while saying he was calling the cops to come arrest me. They either had better things to do or didn't get there until after I left about half an hour later.)

More on this and some still untold census stories, later. Must get back to resumes.
link12 comments|post comment

So, which is it? [May. 24th, 2009|08:31 am]
[Tags|]

we are capable of so much more than we aspire to. -- Elizabeth Bear, in one of her rare l.j. posts.

Ignoring all of the main points of this post and the interesting debates/commentary spinning off therefrom, I choose to focus on this one (very cool sounding) bit and say that one of these things must be true:

(1) Bear is wrong
(2) Mojave misunderstands Bear
(3) Mojave grossly underestimates himself, not to mention many others
(4) I aspire to vastly more than most
or
(5) I am grossly less capable than your average reader.

I am not ruling out the possibility that more than one, or even all, of these may be true.
link2 comments|post comment

Women Fighters are Hot! Pt 2 [May. 13th, 2009|09:54 am]
Too bad I don't know how to transfer and imbed this photo, but . . .

Wow.


http://mmajunkie.com/news/14855/despite-opponent-change-miesha-tate-comfortable-with-win-win-situation.mma

(no, I am not attempting to diminish her athletic accomplishments by pointing this out..)

Congrats to Strikeforce and Showtime for showcasing women as well as men in their MMA cards. =)

Also, congrats to the Meisha for major guts, as her opponent seems like a hell of an introduction to the bigtime . . .

Things have changed quickly for Miesha Tate (6-1).

From Shawnee to Showtime, Tate has gone from a rural Oklahoma fight to national television in just four months.

And as Tate prepares to meet undefeated Canadian Sarah Kaufman (8-0) on the main card of Friday's "Strikeforce Challengers" event in Fresno, Calif., the Washington resident is excited with every last adjustment.

"I'm just really excited to be a part of [Strikeforce]," Tate said. "I think this is the forefront for women's MMA, and I can't be more excited to be a part of it. It really is a dream come true for me."

That dream took a decided plot twist in the past two weeks, when Tate's original opponent, Kim Couture (1-1), was forced to withdraw from the bout for unspecified reasons. Kaufman jumped at the opportunity to step in, and the change of opponents represented a real upgrade for Tate to face.

"At first I was kind of surprised because it was a really big jump," Tate told MMAjunkie.com (www.mmajunkie.com). "But then the more I thought about it, I was thinking that this was a win-win situation for me.
link3 comments|post comment

Anglachel is back! [May. 11th, 2009|11:01 pm]
[Tags|, , ]
[music |While The Rest of Us Sleep, Gram Rabbit]

those of you who care probably already know, but just in case you missed it . . .

http://anglachelg.blogspot.com/


Wheeeeee!

Those of you who don't know if you'll care or not, see above link. Even if you don't always agree w/her politics, she's worth reading for her econ posts alone.

Further quickie discussion of poli-blogs:

Anglachel and Violet Socks ( http://www.reclusiveleftist.com/ ) were prolly my two favorite solo political bloggers last year, and I thought Anglachel might be gone for good. She is also, along w/ http://solarbird.livejournal.com/ & Krugman and Naked Capitalism & Corrente, where I get the best econ postings (not on this list are a couple of terrific places that I just don't go to much, and the possibly best place required some sort of subscription to read the full article the last many times I checked).

In case anyone cares, these are collectively the places, along w/Greenwald, that I feel like I'm missing something if I don't visit fairly often, despite Violet earlier and Anglachel the last couple of months being MIA (though it should be noted Violet has the excuse of being both dead and strung out), just in case anyone cares.

(weirdly enough, none of these people focus as much on the environment as I would like, but several of you wonderful people on my f-list make up for it )

::smiles happily::
linkpost comment

Two cute things from Salon [May. 7th, 2009|09:58 pm]
Mommy, What's A Vagina?
http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2009/05/05/katherine_ozment/index.html

&
Sex, Drugs and My 15 Year Old
http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2007/10/09/sex_drugs/index.html
linkpost comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Advertisement