Home

Advertisement

mojave_wolf [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
mojave_wolf

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

"It's so hard, living in the devil's playground . . ." [Nov. 1st, 2009|06:58 am]
[Tags|, , , , , , , ]
[music |Kundalini, Eva Starsinger]

(I started writing this last night; then got distracted partway through; hope everyone had a Happy Halloween or a sensational Samhain, as the case may be, and yay for a full moon on this particular holiday!)

They’re playing only Halloween appropriate music on the local music show tonight, which says something about the depth of musical talent in such a small area and the inclinations of the local artists, that a few dozen bands can easily fill two hours of music w/one song each given such a theme. And then there’s Gram Rabbit, & to a lesser extent Shawn Mafia, a majority of whose songs would probably be appropriate, and lol, a Shawn Mafia song just came on, The Devil Song, “What you gonna do, whatcha gonna do, sweet darling, when the devil comes looking for you?”; and heh, now a second one, “Death in D Major”)(and lol again, then there was news, and we had a visit from Nipty and Nipster {our names for them, I dunno their real names, but they like to nip, therefore their names}, Patches' two puppies next door [we don't know what happened to Patches; she disappeared in late Spring] who are less than a year old but already as big as Marley, and I had to take them back and put them in their yard, and when I get back, Gram Rabbit, "The Devil's Playground").

Finished reading “The Red Tree” this afternoon, then took a nap for a little over an hour that seemed like several, and woke to the canines barking at something outside and Soft Cell’s “Tainted Love” on the radio, which seemed quite appropriate for what I had been reading. I think I had been dreaming about writing an extended review of the book, and then lay back down and proceeded to keep writing the review in my head once I established there was nothing serious going on w/the dogs, and somehow finished it before the song was over. It’s not a very long song, so I must’ve been really nearly done in my dream, and still half dreaming when I first woke up. This was followed by the song (guessing at the title) “You’re Never There”, which is absurdly appropriate, and two more pre-local music songs (especially apt, ?"All Good Things Come to an End"?, which had me convinced that my state of mind was interpreting everything to be relevant to the book. which is sort of what you might get if you placed a bitingly angry, deeply grieving and deeply depressed lesbian narrator into an updated combination of Algernon Blackwood's "The Willows" and one of Lovecraft's New England stories (gender and orientation noted only due to the male-centricness of those stories--downright sexism in Lovecraft). It's also a ghost story, thought there may or may not be any "real" ghosts in it. Anyway, after my last entry, I figure I owe y'all a cut, plus, I can't really discuss this as I'd like to w/out spoilers. So, be warned, many spoilers ahead. And I no longer remember my dream review, so you'll get something lesser.

If I could only shed this skin, I might be much more real )
linkpost comment

Book reviews [May. 6th, 2009|08:30 pm]
[Tags|]

Way behind on the book reviewing or even book listing, but will just say quickly here are my two favorite books I've read since last posting, and probably my two favorite all year, w/mini-capsule reviews:

Living With Ghosts by Kari Sperring -- Moody, atmospheric story w/beautiful writing and richly textured characters (it's always a good sign when even the unsympathetic characters are interesting and the sympathetic ones have flaws that aren't just tacked on to say "see, they have quirks!" and the lot of them have plenty of depth). If you like your prose elegant and sensual, characters and plots multi-layered, and your setting as much a character as the people, read this. Also will work for anyone who likes deeply involved character interactions, politics of both the personal and the statescraft sort, and all sorts of angsty drama and swashbuckling derring do.

Should appeal especially to fans of Tanith Lee (esp Elle Est Trois, La Morte and Sung in Shadow, Sarah Monette (if you liked Melusine, go ahead and pick this up; they have different strengths story-wise but I think anyone who likes the atmosphere and cityscape of Melusine is likely to be fond of this as well) and Jaqueline Carey's Kushiel series (of several people who do a mixture of swashbuckling and politics, this is the one that comes closest in my head, though I can see anyone from fans of Sherwood Smith to George RR Martin to, hell, some of Jeffrey Archer's better work, finding something to like here). Oh, Lankhmar. If you liked it as a setting, though the characters and stories are very different from Lieber's.


&

Seabiscuit by Lauren Hildebrand (this book is long back at the library, so can't swear I spelled her name right, sorries). The book the movie was based on; I'd been meaning to get it for a while to see how accurate the movie was; as it turns out the answer is "sorta". Aside from the truly amazing story of the horse (and wow that they used to run that often; htf did they manage not to break down? Tho Seabiscuit ran even more often than most of the others, thus proving that The Black Stallion series was not so unrealistic about this as I later came to believe.) Also amazing stories for both jockeys, the trainer and the owner; the movie hinted at but didn't fully do justice to any of this.

I should probably save these reviews for when I have time to do them right and do not feel like I have an ever more achy fever, but better poorly written good recommendations than no recs ever, which is certainly possible at this rate.

Also would be great to review if I had a review in me right now:

Implied Spaces by Walter Jon Williams. If it had said "by Roger Zelazny" on the cover I would never have known the difference; reads *exactly* like Zelazny, much more so than like Williams, inf fact. I love both writers but found this a little disconcerting. Wry humor, gallows sarcasm, swashbuckling mixed with bioengineering, quantum phsyics of a sort and aritificial intelligence, and even zombies! (more specifically, a zombie plague) And questions about the ethics of AI's, and issues of identity similar to those raised by Elizabeth Bear's Undertow, which I need to rereard but otherwise has nothing to do w/this.

So I should have liked it better than I did; should have deeply loved rather than liked, and not sure why not. But still very well worth reading. Will also appeal greatly to the cat lovers among you. Seriously. Cat-as-avatar for artificial intelligence one of the main characters.


Lord of Misrule by Rachel Caine was good but a disappointment--too heavy on the plot and action, which makes sense since it essentially continued from a cliffhanger from a previous book and set up more to come in the next book all in the same breakneck plot thread, if that isn't giving too much away. Would have liked it more w/lower expectatons, I'm sure, as I *love* this series. And despite what I just said read this book at lightning speed and found it hard to put down and pretty much all the plot and character elements worked for me; just too few of the character and to much of the plot for this to be a stand alone novel I'd been waiting months for. Overdoing it a bit on the cliffhangers, too. Despite the disappointment, still recommended.

Also disappointing: a couple of other teen vampire novels, Blue Bloods and Masquerade, by, I think, Melissa de la Cruz (I will check this soon, but someone correct me if I'm wrong; these were back at the library in early February). Kept me reading and I'll read the third because does a decent job keeping me interested in what happens next and a couple of characters I like enough for this to matter, but basically falls under the heading "Vampires for Cruel Intentions Set"; rich NYC preps descended from Mayflower families turn out to be vampires! Which was meant to be snarky but actually sounds better than it is, as the whole backdrop for who the vamps are and how they got here just doesn't work *at all* for me. But Schuyler and Bliss are worth following, and it has some decent pacing and situational set-ups to keep me going.

Even more disappointing tho still readable: Not saying the name of book or author, because, okay, this got pretty decent recs from a couple of people on my f-list and the writer is clearly talented and probably a nice person (one gets that impression from the book, at least, just as some books make me think I'd hate the author), has a nice writing style and sense of pace and an interesting, cocky wise-cracking first person narrator, and, well, I'm sorry but I thought everyone in the book was just too stupid. None of the people other than the narrator seemed like fully realized characters. And the cliched gender stereotyping was annoying. Sorry.
link5 comments|post comment

Book reviews [Feb. 5th, 2009|08:46 pm]
[Tags|, ]

On the premise that more problematic (for me) books are much easier to write about, I'm saving The Bone Key & Half A Crown for later, and reviewing the book I both loved and had really serious issues with.

The Monkey Wrench Gang, by Edward Abbey.
Read more )
That said, except for a half dozen times where I seriously thought about putting it down and never finishing it, and one stretch that dragged a bit, and a tendency towards predictability, and all the things mentioned above, I loved most of the book. Those of you with libertarian & nature loving tendencies will be most likely to like it also, as will anyone who appreciates something that starts off with a chapter entitled "Prologue: The Aftermath".
linkpost comment

Books [Jan. 16th, 2009|04:57 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Books read so far this year:

Spook Country, by William Gibson
Ink Exchange, by Melissa Marr

Both highly recommended, tho trigger warnings of all sorts for the second.

SC, like much of Gibson's work, is as much extended tone poem as novel, and like Pattern Recognition, is set in today's world and is only marginally science fictional (and even has an overlapping character and company). The beginning doesn't blow me away w/brilliance like PR (hey, i just noticed how the letters of the title relate to much of what the book is about; am I slow or what?) (this does not, so far as I can tell, work w/the newest), but neither does the end, while deliberately anti-climactic, leave me feeling disappointed that it didn't live up to the rest. Also, sort of early Elmore Leonard-ish in a bizarre, hi-tech ultra modern sort of way, if you can imagine that applied to, say, Mr Majestyk. Anyone who likes Gibson's writing style should enjoy. Quickie plot: Start up magazine hires former singer turned journalist to write article on artist and new type of art, meanwhile a covert operation by former CIA agents and a covert operation by a family of former Cuban agents are mutually hostile and intertwined and these two plot threads intersect in a way that actually makes sense. Laced with drugs, altered perceptions and voodoo, along with great scene/mood descriptions and, like I said, a big long tone poem of a low key thriller.

Ink Exchange was the book I've been most looking forward to and dreading reading since I finished Wicked Lovely, which I will obsessively recommend to all and sundry for the jillionth time. Looking forward to in hope it will live up to its predecessor, dreading in fear it would not . . . check the ticky box for the former. Anyone who liked the first or is at all interested in urban fantasy or tattoos should check this out (and keep in mind that I, who have none and really am not that interested in tattoos, loved it muchest, so don't let that get in your way, either). Totally blew me away, so much so that I have trouble figuring out what to say in a quickie review and I don't have time for longer. This is going to be the first book I take the time to reread in quite a while. I loved the middle more than the beginning or end, which is the opposite of how I usually feel about books, but the end was satisfying, the beginning was quite good, it's just the middle was downright hallucinatory in how affected my emotions. Will be interesting to see if I like it as much on reread. Was set up for heartbreakingness early on and wasn't wrong, but not in the way I expected while being more or less on of the scenarios I expected, which somehow worked out really well, and I dunno how to say more w/out being spoilery. Again, tho, trigger warnings of all sorts abound, some of which might be directly applicable to people reading this. Interesting that a book w/addictions themes was so addictive reading; I mean, I stayed up till I was sure I wouldn't be able to get up for work in decent shape trying to finish it the first night, then woke up and stayed up early to read it more, if that tells ya anything.

Crrently checked out of the library: The Monkey Wrench Gang, by Edward Abbey, and Collapse, by Jared Diamond. Am at library now so more may be added.
link3 comments|post comment

It's the end of February, so books I have read this year [Feb. 29th, 2008|12:36 pm]
[Tags|, , , , , ]

The pace has been rather slower than last year. No surprise, since I've *never* read that many books; dunno what got into me. Possibly stupidity. But anyway, returning more or less to previous levels of reading, first, fiction, more or less in order of how much I liked them:

Inda, by Sherwood Smith. The first in yet another fantasy series, but I *seriously* recommend anyone interested in fantasy check this out.

Among the good things about this book: The author has clearly thought about the less savory implications of arranged marriages, and given us a society where magic works (admittedly, only the tiny, relatively subtle remnants of what used to be much more magic) where the magic users also thought about this and put their magic to good use.

Some of the people on my f-list have expressed a desire for more books with gay characters who just happen to be gay. This has several of those, of both genders, including the character I would call the second lead, if I had to call someone the second lead, and including bisexuals as well as hetero and straight people. While the society where most of the book takes place is highly militaristic, feudal and backwards in some ways that very important to the plot, the attitude towards sexuality and sex is, well, what I wish the attitude towards sex was in this world.

Can turn heartbreaking and make you cry in a shocking instant without making a part of your brain worry the author is taking a bit of sadistic glee in slaughtering/mutilating the likable characters . . . (I realize what that sounds like, but I'm still a fan of the other series, really) (like that other series, this has a whole bunch of characters, many very likable, many mixed, and some hatable, though I didn't think there were going to be any real fully hatable people at first--you can understand someone's motivations from their pov and still hate them)

In general, everything seems to be exceptionally well thought out, including the implications of all sorts of stuff I don't have time to go into, how people gradually become better or worse (this spans years so we get to see a lot of this) or just different. I especially liked some of the marginally unlikable people in the book went in vastly different directions as the story went on.

I suck at giving non-spoilery plot descriptions, but basically, second son of an important but non-royal family unexpectedly gets called to begin military drilling under the thumb of the royal types, more to serve as hostage to his families good behavior than anything else (along w/all the other second sons of important families). Various political manueverings and youthful hijinks ensue.

Smith has historically written juveniles and at the beginning I was somewhat wondering why this wasn't marketed as one, but unlike ASOIAF, the characters get older at a less than glacial pace, and while everything seems rather innocent and non-life threatening at the beginning, as far as political power games go, things change. Ended on a genuinely surprising cliffhanger, has me waiting eagerly to start the next one.

Dust by Elizabeth Bear, & Undertow, also by Elizabeth Bear.

Put these on the same line cause if I had to pick a favorite, it would be a toss-up. Really liked both of these as well, though Undertow is easier to write about. A very well-crafted thriller, you could call it an science fictional anthropological eco-thriller, I guess, which has all the good things I like about straight action oriented set-in-this-world-and-time thrillers, plus I loved all the extra goodies involving the planetary ecosystem and a system of probability manipulation involving a local mining ore and a whole bunch of stuff about class and xenophobia and exploitation and greed. Also, the lead is an assassin, and I find this line of work fascinating. A semi-sociopath, who has some feelings and empathy but isn't cuddly at all in his ability to just shut them off to get the job done, and all of the characters are quite interesting, again. I was reading this and thinking "this really is so much better than most best-selling thrillers, why isn't it one?" and wondered if the lack of cuddliness might be the explanation there.

Running out of time, here, so will finish later w/nonfiction and Dust & Simon R Green's The Unnatural Enquirer, tho not much to say about that last--if you liked the series thus far you will like it and it's better than Hell to Pay but not up to the best of the authors work.
linkpost comment

Books, non-fiction best reads in 2007 [Jan. 27th, 2008|10:14 am]
[Tags|, , , , ]

Because I absolutely *must* do this before the end of January, or it will have to get skipped . . .

In brief, the criteria-- I read the book all the way through in 2007 (or was at least close to the finish by new year's), no-rereads, publication date irrelevant, and am convinced I like it enough to recommend really highly.

As with last year, a shorter non-fic than fic list, both because I read fewer non-fic books (I read just as much nonfiction, if not more, but newspapers and blogs and magazines were a huge part of that; as long as I'm dong a best-of, my favorite magazine column of 2007 was Katha Pollitt in The Nation; my favorite blog was The Sideshow, both for political commentary and because it is the best place for links to other interesting blogs/commentary, and whilst I could have fun doing a top 10-list here w/everyone from Glenn Greenwald to Echidne of the Snakes, I suspect the number of people actually reading *my* blog might drop to flat zero if I did that), and because, for some bizarre reason, they just don't stick in my mind as well.

I can't for sure remember the December/January reading time of Paul Krugman's "The Conscience of a Liberal," so while it is good enough to make the short list and I recommend it highly, it's going on next year's.

Anyway, here goes . . .

1. Evolving God by Barbara J King. Beautifully written book about notions of spirituality in general and the whole concept of god evolved, with the theory that it has its roots in the same part of our brains & thought processes that produces empathy, to oversimplify a lot. Also contains a lot about empathy and social interaction among non-human animals, espeically apes, and a lot about differing concepts of spirituality and deity. One of the rare books on religion that should manage to appeal to everyone from the more traditional theists to to the atheists on my f-list, and also anyone who's an animal lover. It isn't specifically making an appeal for animals rights or better treatment of animals for their own sakes, as opposed to just because preserving biodiversity is good for humans, but I can't see how anyone reading this book could NOT think of that. (if someone who is turned off by the notion of animal rights is on my friends list, this shouldn't turn you off the book, necessarily, that's my interpretation and not the point of the book)

2. Helen Caldicott's Why Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer -- not the best written of the books, but given the increasing number of people, most troubling the increasing number of people on the left, who want an immediate massive investment in nuclear power and think it is the only way to save us from globabl warming, I think this is the most *important* book that came out last year, or at least it would be if it had gotten lots of attention. Alas, books & articles promoting nuclear, which already has a lot of money invested in it, get much the bigger promotion than books explaining in a lot more detail why it isn't even a particularly good short term solution--grossly expensive and beyond risky. In the same vein, the Utne reader had nice piece on this subject in their most recent issue, and Scientific American has a cover story on how solar could be supplying all our energy needs by the end of the century, even without new technology (which one would presume will come about, since solar has yet to see really big time investment, alas that Carter lost in '80; we'd probably already be mostly solar and minimally fossil fuel if he had won reelection). My original review w/discussion of a book that took the totally opposite point of view is here: http://mojave-wolf.livejournal.com/30198.html#cutid1


3. Terry Glavin, The Sixth Extinction: Journeys Among The Lost and Left
Behind.
Wow. In a lot of ways, the best written and most fun to read non-fiction book I've ever read. Docked a couple of spots because the author annoys me a few times with his dismissive views towards animal intelligence and those who think whales are up there on a level with humans (complete w/pointless shots at Carl Sagan), but other than that you could certainly make a strong case for this being far and away the best book of the year, fic or non-fic. I went on about this at great length in two separate places earlier this year, which I will link to, but first a quick summary from one of those: A beautifully written,
lyrical book, as can be gleaned from from chapter titles such as "Valley of the Black Pig", "The Singing Tree of Chungliyimti", and "The Last Giants in the River of the Black Dragon".
Most of the first half of the book is concerned with the lost of wild land
and species. The second half is mostly concerned with the loss of human
cultures, languages and domestic plants/food crops. One may be dismayed to learn of "patent-protected 'terminator' seeds that produce plants that kill their own seeds or refuse to grow at all unless sprayed with one of the company's herbicides." One may find
oneself agreeing with Richard Manning that the great agribusiness
revolution of the 1960's is "the worst thing that has ever happened on the
planet",that solved (some) local problems only by exchanging them for
unprecedented, global-scale problems."

Despite the author's optimistic view, by the time I got to the finish, I
saw it more as an ode to things passing away than as an optimistic work
showing how humanity is working to save things. Yes, many humans are. More
are working to enrich themselves however possible, and those w/the most
power and least actual need to enrich themselves are doing this in the
worst possible way.

http://mojave-wolf.livejournal.com/30198.html#cutid1 (for review # 1, before I'd finished, concerned w/writing style as much as anything else)
http://mojave-wolf.livejournal.com/32485.html#cutid1 (once I'd finished, w/lots more detail, esp about the latter parts of the book)


Those three were way ahead of everything else, but also making my top 5:

4. Deep Economy, by Bill McKibben (edited from original review) Points out how traditional economics as taught and practiced in most places these days fails to account for all sorts of social and environmental costs, and towards a sort of economics that does these things. Also does a nice job of illustrating that there are all sorts of environmental damage beyoned global warming or even pollution and habitat destruction -- northern China as an example of the kind of catastrophe the whole world is going to face from diminishing water sources unless we get more responsible about our usage of this, amongst other things. And takes apart a lot of big agriculture propaganda against smaller or more localized farming.

I confess, some stuff in the book kinda rubbed me the wrong way -- while I
certainly agree we have a responsibility for each other, the emphasis on
community was a little too much for my anti-social taste, & I nearly quit reading when he said "the rest of this book is devoted to the economics of
neighborliness" (don't stop there, btw, the rest of the book is actually
really good); didn't care for his overall excessive cheeriness or his
repeated mentions of being a Sunday school teacher or his being way, way
way too kind in his evaluation of all sorts of people and arguments, but
then, this may be exactly the kind of person/book/argumentation most
likely to reach those people who still resist more
environmentally/socially friendly ways of life.


5. Infidel, by Ayaan Hirsi Ali A really gripping if sometimes problematic memoir. Don't always agree with her politics or her analysis, but nonetheless an extremely worthwhile read. For a longer take, http://mojave-wolf.livejournal.com/33707.html

For what it's worth, "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" would have made the list in the #4 spot, except I've heard people cast doubts as to its authenticity, and I haven't had time to check it out. Certainly, most of it rang true to me, but there was one point in particular where I wondered about embellishment, so holding off on ranking/reccing it for right now.

Fiction reviews (that will probably be a top 20, because I'm indecisive about narrowing things down) will hopefully finally show up tomorrow or Tuesday.
link5 comments|post comment

la la la [Sep. 3rd, 2007|12:33 pm]
[Tags|, , , , , ]

My writing is flowing somewhat again, but have not nearly the time/energy I'd like, so l.j. is going to continue to be sporadic for a long time, most likely.

Am now deeply regretting my plan to review, at least briefly, every book I read this year. These will be *most quickly written reviews ever* (and my book reading is about to diminish as well, which will at least spare me doing this the rest of the year, silly me for even taking that internal pledge seriously, bah!):

Read more... )
link4 comments|post comment

Swimming in the hot dry wind [Jun. 21st, 2007|12:47 pm]
[Tags|, , ]

Book reviews, fiction:

Liked:
Read more... )

Also liked but saved 'till the bottom cause already recently reviewed elsewhere on f-list:
Read more... )

Okay, but don't kill yourself rushing to get a copy:
Read more... )

Didn't Like:
Read more... )

Things in Progress:
Read more... )

and lastly . . . Recap of previous rave review of Jo Walton's Farthing cause it was at the bottom of a political post and not sure if all of you read that far and I really love this book:

Read more... )
link4 comments|post comment

Chaotic dual review of books w/mention of scattered others . . . [Oct. 21st, 2006|05:29 pm]
[Tags|, , , , , ]

I've been meaning to write reviews for both Blood & Iron and House of Chains, and now I finally get to do them, and together! Which I wanted, because both have a ton of really wonderful, make you love them aspects, but both also have flaws, and it's a nice sort of compare and contrast between the sort of problematic elements that make me go "hmmm . . ." and maybe aren't problematic after all (except to the extent they diminished the enjoyment of my initial two readings of the book)(this would be Bear's book), as opposed to the sort of problematic elements that make me wanna hurt someone, or more to the point, can ruin what would have been an otherwise wonderful reading experience and would assure that I never picked up another book by the author, had I not read three previous by him.

First, tho, let me say that at least the first two thirds of Elizabeth Bear's Blood & Iron are wonderful, in a way that's really hard to describe. Read more... )
link21 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]

Advertisement