Home

Advertisement

mojave_wolf [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
mojave_wolf

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

"It's so hard, living in the devil's playground . . ." [Nov. 1st, 2009|06:58 am]
[Tags|, , , , , , , ]
[music |Kundalini, Eva Starsinger]

(I started writing this last night; then got distracted partway through; hope everyone had a Happy Halloween or a sensational Samhain, as the case may be, and yay for a full moon on this particular holiday!)

They’re playing only Halloween appropriate music on the local music show tonight, which says something about the depth of musical talent in such a small area and the inclinations of the local artists, that a few dozen bands can easily fill two hours of music w/one song each given such a theme. And then there’s Gram Rabbit, & to a lesser extent Shawn Mafia, a majority of whose songs would probably be appropriate, and lol, a Shawn Mafia song just came on, The Devil Song, “What you gonna do, whatcha gonna do, sweet darling, when the devil comes looking for you?”; and heh, now a second one, “Death in D Major”)(and lol again, then there was news, and we had a visit from Nipty and Nipster {our names for them, I dunno their real names, but they like to nip, therefore their names}, Patches' two puppies next door [we don't know what happened to Patches; she disappeared in late Spring] who are less than a year old but already as big as Marley, and I had to take them back and put them in their yard, and when I get back, Gram Rabbit, "The Devil's Playground").

Finished reading “The Red Tree” this afternoon, then took a nap for a little over an hour that seemed like several, and woke to the canines barking at something outside and Soft Cell’s “Tainted Love” on the radio, which seemed quite appropriate for what I had been reading. I think I had been dreaming about writing an extended review of the book, and then lay back down and proceeded to keep writing the review in my head once I established there was nothing serious going on w/the dogs, and somehow finished it before the song was over. It’s not a very long song, so I must’ve been really nearly done in my dream, and still half dreaming when I first woke up. This was followed by the song (guessing at the title) “You’re Never There”, which is absurdly appropriate, and two more pre-local music songs (especially apt, ?"All Good Things Come to an End"?, which had me convinced that my state of mind was interpreting everything to be relevant to the book. which is sort of what you might get if you placed a bitingly angry, deeply grieving and deeply depressed lesbian narrator into an updated combination of Algernon Blackwood's "The Willows" and one of Lovecraft's New England stories (gender and orientation noted only due to the male-centricness of those stories--downright sexism in Lovecraft). It's also a ghost story, thought there may or may not be any "real" ghosts in it. Anyway, after my last entry, I figure I owe y'all a cut, plus, I can't really discuss this as I'd like to w/out spoilers. So, be warned, many spoilers ahead. And I no longer remember my dream review, so you'll get something lesser.

If I could only shed this skin, I might be much more real )
link5 comments|post comment

Since it is October . . . [Oct. 17th, 2009|10:51 am]
[Tags|, , ]

Point for debate: While it may or may not be the scariest horror movie of all time, Carrie is the best horror movie of all time.
Even if you don't want to actually debate, would love to hear what other people think are best/favorites.

Second Point for debate: King Kong is really a tragedy, not a horror movie, even though it is usually considered one. If it is one, it would make the above point much more debatable. Relevant: When asked in a college lit class my impressions of Moby Dick, I justified my inclusion as the only undergrad in the graduate seminar by responding "I was pulling for the whale."

"Scariest," "best" and "most fun to watch" are three entirely different things, horror movie wise, imo, Scariest? "Hill House" --original, omg not the new shit thingy -- "The Ring" or "Nightmare On Elm Street" -- or or maybe "The Haunting of Hell House" or either of the first two Grudge movies or "The Shining", and I don't know if it would hold up as an adult move but Salem's Lot was was omg scary as a mini-series when I was little: I went around drawing crosses on all the doors and windows after I had a nightmare where I thought I woke up and heard a noise and went' into the kitchen and saw that caretaker vampire sitting in the chair in the den on the way back to my room and then woke up and had actually sleepwalked for the only time in my life and was standing in the den in the nearly pitch dark facing that chair. "The Birds" scared me as a kid but probably wouldn't so much now. Examples of fun but not really "good" and scary but not that scary include "Shocker", the "Jason vs. Tina" Friday the 13th movie (part VII, I think).

Best Horror Sequel: "Bride of Frankenstein" or "The Grudge 2" or other?

Best opening sequence of a horror movie: the first 15 minutes of "Werewolves on Wheels", which should be seen for that alone.

What are some of your horror favorites? What are some of the most obscure horror favorites? Things I should consider renting if haven't seen yet?

Caitlin Kiernan has a new book out, called "The Red Tree." I have it on order from the library.

A new Morganville Vampires book is due out next month. Dunno why they didn't try to get that in before Halloween. Something about when things are more likely to sell or avoiding the rush of other similarly themed books, I suppose.
link24 comments|post comment

Wow. So people didn't know . . . [Sep. 12th, 2009|08:33 am]
[Tags|, , , , , , , ]

Just realized from reading a friend's blog that all the A Song of Ice and Fire fans on my f-list might not know there is a two hour pilot being cast for A Game of Thrones, and that casting is well under way, a start date for filming in Ireland is set, and if the show gets picked up (as seems probable at this point, given the investment they're putting in the pilot and the huge amount of buzz it's generating), we have a series, with the plan being a book a season, and the ever-increasing probability that the final season will finish airing before the final book is finished being written.

(hee! just to make it clear, this is said in good humor; I'm not one of the crazies pushing GRRM to hurry up; if he never finishes I will be disappointed but they are his books and quite honestly, better never finished than finished but lacking. I am one of the people disappointed in how King wrapped up the Gunslinger series, though that may have been inevitable given how very differently King and I view the first book in the series; I started to read his rewrite of it, read the preface and bailed, thinking I'll stick to my memories, thankee! Also, I am the last person in the world to have any business criticizing someone else for writer's block, having not finished anything -or even having half finished anything - since the 90's. The mid-90's.)

The casting looks great so far; I'm really pleasantly surprised. A lot of people are not. I think many of these people have an unrealistic expectation of how casting can go-- the main thing is to get people who can act and not cast Paul Rubens as Ned or Robert Hulk Hogan as Tyrion, and suddenly have Brienne looking and acting like Catwoman. Avoid stuff like this, and you're ahead of the game. Meanwhile, there is no one out there w/silver hair and violet eyes who will fit everyone's ideal of Dany. I think Tamzin Merchant seems like a good call. Sean Bean, Lena Heady, all these people, I'm cool with. The guy playing Jon has my last name so he better fucking be great. Anywhow, from what I can tell, things are looking good so far. (Of course, I probably won't be able to *watch* the series, as Sasha and I watch everything together and there is too much in here that will be too upsetting for her, and I think there's a good chance the first of these things might make it into the pilot--it's a crucial plot point so no way to leave it out--so probably can't even watch that, but as long as this is being done I want it done well and to succeed massively, and sounds like tis heading the right direction.

Also in epic fantasy --
Since I only recently found out about this and a lot of you probably don't know, the first of the homestretch sequence for the Wheel of Time is supposed to come out in October. I am looking forward to with great interest.

And am just past page 400 in Sherwood Smith's Treason's Shore, what I thought was the wrap up for her Inda series. I'm at a loss as to how this is going to get wrapped up in the next 200 and something pages, but it's certainly a terrific book thus far.

Also in reading--
I have read a few other books deserving of reviews since last I did a book recap in the spring, (Caitlin Kiernan's Low Red Moon, Daughter of Hounds, and Silk, Lev Grossman's The Magicians, a couple of graphic novels that I like enough to wanna review--After the Fall, Hush and The Heart of Hush, and eventually hope to review them, but my reviews have all been horrifically awfully written this year, so waiting till I have time to do them right, and as the books pile up the time needed to do them right piles up, so . . . hold not thy breath)

Also in TV-- Dollhouse is renewed. People seem confused about this. Season 2 starts sometime this month, I think. There was a good write-up about it by Suzie at Echidne recently -- I have lost the link and lack the patience to look, but is very worth reading if you are one at all curious about the show.

eta -- wow, my level of typos and left out words and run-on sentences hit a new high there. hopefully fixed. also, this series seems to attract more crazy and annoying fans than anything else ever. I swear!

Okay, I'm arguably crazy and may be annoying, but I don't send hate mail to people because I don't want them to be cast in a certain part or generally spout the kind of awfulness I often see in comments at various places, good grief!
link6 comments|post comment

Rather late, the obligatory "books read in January' thingie [Feb. 5th, 2009|12:47 pm]
[Tags|, , ]

(in order of reading)

Spook Country, William Gibson
Ink Exchange, Melissa Marr
The Bone Key, Sarah Monette
Haunted, by Joyce Carol Oates (didn't finish, not in the mood for this right now despite great writing, review to follow maybe)
The Monkey Wrench Gang, by Edward Abbey (a great book in many ways, a deeply offensive books in many, clearly intentional ways, and almost put it down a few times)
Half A Crown, by Jo Walton

Still haven't finished but very interesting so far: Collapse, by Jared Diamond (and for everyone who never read Guns, Germs & Steel, it's a non-fiction must!)

I liked all the ones I finished, tho I have reservations about the Abbey book. Funnily enough, I ordered it right before the giant dust-up some of you may have noticed (and one I had the sense to stay out, for once!), and was reading it during.
link2 comments|post comment

Books [Jan. 16th, 2009|04:57 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Books read so far this year:

Spook Country, by William Gibson
Ink Exchange, by Melissa Marr

Both highly recommended, tho trigger warnings of all sorts for the second.

SC, like much of Gibson's work, is as much extended tone poem as novel, and like Pattern Recognition, is set in today's world and is only marginally science fictional (and even has an overlapping character and company). The beginning doesn't blow me away w/brilliance like PR (hey, i just noticed how the letters of the title relate to much of what the book is about; am I slow or what?) (this does not, so far as I can tell, work w/the newest), but neither does the end, while deliberately anti-climactic, leave me feeling disappointed that it didn't live up to the rest. Also, sort of early Elmore Leonard-ish in a bizarre, hi-tech ultra modern sort of way, if you can imagine that applied to, say, Mr Majestyk. Anyone who likes Gibson's writing style should enjoy. Quickie plot: Start up magazine hires former singer turned journalist to write article on artist and new type of art, meanwhile a covert operation by former CIA agents and a covert operation by a family of former Cuban agents are mutually hostile and intertwined and these two plot threads intersect in a way that actually makes sense. Laced with drugs, altered perceptions and voodoo, along with great scene/mood descriptions and, like I said, a big long tone poem of a low key thriller.

Ink Exchange was the book I've been most looking forward to and dreading reading since I finished Wicked Lovely, which I will obsessively recommend to all and sundry for the jillionth time. Looking forward to in hope it will live up to its predecessor, dreading in fear it would not . . . check the ticky box for the former. Anyone who liked the first or is at all interested in urban fantasy or tattoos should check this out (and keep in mind that I, who have none and really am not that interested in tattoos, loved it muchest, so don't let that get in your way, either). Totally blew me away, so much so that I have trouble figuring out what to say in a quickie review and I don't have time for longer. This is going to be the first book I take the time to reread in quite a while. I loved the middle more than the beginning or end, which is the opposite of how I usually feel about books, but the end was satisfying, the beginning was quite good, it's just the middle was downright hallucinatory in how affected my emotions. Will be interesting to see if I like it as much on reread. Was set up for heartbreakingness early on and wasn't wrong, but not in the way I expected while being more or less on of the scenarios I expected, which somehow worked out really well, and I dunno how to say more w/out being spoilery. Again, tho, trigger warnings of all sorts abound, some of which might be directly applicable to people reading this. Interesting that a book w/addictions themes was so addictive reading; I mean, I stayed up till I was sure I wouldn't be able to get up for work in decent shape trying to finish it the first night, then woke up and stayed up early to read it more, if that tells ya anything.

Crrently checked out of the library: The Monkey Wrench Gang, by Edward Abbey, and Collapse, by Jared Diamond. Am at library now so more may be added.
link3 comments|post comment

It's the end of February, so books I have read this year [Feb. 29th, 2008|12:36 pm]
[Tags|, , , , , ]

The pace has been rather slower than last year. No surprise, since I've *never* read that many books; dunno what got into me. Possibly stupidity. But anyway, returning more or less to previous levels of reading, first, fiction, more or less in order of how much I liked them:

Inda, by Sherwood Smith. The first in yet another fantasy series, but I *seriously* recommend anyone interested in fantasy check this out.

Among the good things about this book: The author has clearly thought about the less savory implications of arranged marriages, and given us a society where magic works (admittedly, only the tiny, relatively subtle remnants of what used to be much more magic) where the magic users also thought about this and put their magic to good use.

Some of the people on my f-list have expressed a desire for more books with gay characters who just happen to be gay. This has several of those, of both genders, including the character I would call the second lead, if I had to call someone the second lead, and including bisexuals as well as hetero and straight people. While the society where most of the book takes place is highly militaristic, feudal and backwards in some ways that very important to the plot, the attitude towards sexuality and sex is, well, what I wish the attitude towards sex was in this world.

Can turn heartbreaking and make you cry in a shocking instant without making a part of your brain worry the author is taking a bit of sadistic glee in slaughtering/mutilating the likable characters . . . (I realize what that sounds like, but I'm still a fan of the other series, really) (like that other series, this has a whole bunch of characters, many very likable, many mixed, and some hatable, though I didn't think there were going to be any real fully hatable people at first--you can understand someone's motivations from their pov and still hate them)

In general, everything seems to be exceptionally well thought out, including the implications of all sorts of stuff I don't have time to go into, how people gradually become better or worse (this spans years so we get to see a lot of this) or just different. I especially liked some of the marginally unlikable people in the book went in vastly different directions as the story went on.

I suck at giving non-spoilery plot descriptions, but basically, second son of an important but non-royal family unexpectedly gets called to begin military drilling under the thumb of the royal types, more to serve as hostage to his families good behavior than anything else (along w/all the other second sons of important families). Various political manueverings and youthful hijinks ensue.

Smith has historically written juveniles and at the beginning I was somewhat wondering why this wasn't marketed as one, but unlike ASOIAF, the characters get older at a less than glacial pace, and while everything seems rather innocent and non-life threatening at the beginning, as far as political power games go, things change. Ended on a genuinely surprising cliffhanger, has me waiting eagerly to start the next one.

Dust by Elizabeth Bear, & Undertow, also by Elizabeth Bear.

Put these on the same line cause if I had to pick a favorite, it would be a toss-up. Really liked both of these as well, though Undertow is easier to write about. A very well-crafted thriller, you could call it an science fictional anthropological eco-thriller, I guess, which has all the good things I like about straight action oriented set-in-this-world-and-time thrillers, plus I loved all the extra goodies involving the planetary ecosystem and a system of probability manipulation involving a local mining ore and a whole bunch of stuff about class and xenophobia and exploitation and greed. Also, the lead is an assassin, and I find this line of work fascinating. A semi-sociopath, who has some feelings and empathy but isn't cuddly at all in his ability to just shut them off to get the job done, and all of the characters are quite interesting, again. I was reading this and thinking "this really is so much better than most best-selling thrillers, why isn't it one?" and wondered if the lack of cuddliness might be the explanation there.

Running out of time, here, so will finish later w/nonfiction and Dust & Simon R Green's The Unnatural Enquirer, tho not much to say about that last--if you liked the series thus far you will like it and it's better than Hell to Pay but not up to the best of the authors work.
linkpost comment

Books, non-fiction best reads in 2007 [Jan. 27th, 2008|10:14 am]
[Tags|, , , , ]

Because I absolutely *must* do this before the end of January, or it will have to get skipped . . .

In brief, the criteria-- I read the book all the way through in 2007 (or was at least close to the finish by new year's), no-rereads, publication date irrelevant, and am convinced I like it enough to recommend really highly.

As with last year, a shorter non-fic than fic list, both because I read fewer non-fic books (I read just as much nonfiction, if not more, but newspapers and blogs and magazines were a huge part of that; as long as I'm dong a best-of, my favorite magazine column of 2007 was Katha Pollitt in The Nation; my favorite blog was The Sideshow, both for political commentary and because it is the best place for links to other interesting blogs/commentary, and whilst I could have fun doing a top 10-list here w/everyone from Glenn Greenwald to Echidne of the Snakes, I suspect the number of people actually reading *my* blog might drop to flat zero if I did that), and because, for some bizarre reason, they just don't stick in my mind as well.

I can't for sure remember the December/January reading time of Paul Krugman's "The Conscience of a Liberal," so while it is good enough to make the short list and I recommend it highly, it's going on next year's.

Anyway, here goes . . .

1. Evolving God by Barbara J King. Beautifully written book about notions of spirituality in general and the whole concept of god evolved, with the theory that it has its roots in the same part of our brains & thought processes that produces empathy, to oversimplify a lot. Also contains a lot about empathy and social interaction among non-human animals, espeically apes, and a lot about differing concepts of spirituality and deity. One of the rare books on religion that should manage to appeal to everyone from the more traditional theists to to the atheists on my f-list, and also anyone who's an animal lover. It isn't specifically making an appeal for animals rights or better treatment of animals for their own sakes, as opposed to just because preserving biodiversity is good for humans, but I can't see how anyone reading this book could NOT think of that. (if someone who is turned off by the notion of animal rights is on my friends list, this shouldn't turn you off the book, necessarily, that's my interpretation and not the point of the book)

2. Helen Caldicott's Why Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer -- not the best written of the books, but given the increasing number of people, most troubling the increasing number of people on the left, who want an immediate massive investment in nuclear power and think it is the only way to save us from globabl warming, I think this is the most *important* book that came out last year, or at least it would be if it had gotten lots of attention. Alas, books & articles promoting nuclear, which already has a lot of money invested in it, get much the bigger promotion than books explaining in a lot more detail why it isn't even a particularly good short term solution--grossly expensive and beyond risky. In the same vein, the Utne reader had nice piece on this subject in their most recent issue, and Scientific American has a cover story on how solar could be supplying all our energy needs by the end of the century, even without new technology (which one would presume will come about, since solar has yet to see really big time investment, alas that Carter lost in '80; we'd probably already be mostly solar and minimally fossil fuel if he had won reelection). My original review w/discussion of a book that took the totally opposite point of view is here: http://mojave-wolf.livejournal.com/30198.html#cutid1


3. Terry Glavin, The Sixth Extinction: Journeys Among The Lost and Left
Behind.
Wow. In a lot of ways, the best written and most fun to read non-fiction book I've ever read. Docked a couple of spots because the author annoys me a few times with his dismissive views towards animal intelligence and those who think whales are up there on a level with humans (complete w/pointless shots at Carl Sagan), but other than that you could certainly make a strong case for this being far and away the best book of the year, fic or non-fic. I went on about this at great length in two separate places earlier this year, which I will link to, but first a quick summary from one of those: A beautifully written,
lyrical book, as can be gleaned from from chapter titles such as "Valley of the Black Pig", "The Singing Tree of Chungliyimti", and "The Last Giants in the River of the Black Dragon".
Most of the first half of the book is concerned with the lost of wild land
and species. The second half is mostly concerned with the loss of human
cultures, languages and domestic plants/food crops. One may be dismayed to learn of "patent-protected 'terminator' seeds that produce plants that kill their own seeds or refuse to grow at all unless sprayed with one of the company's herbicides." One may find
oneself agreeing with Richard Manning that the great agribusiness
revolution of the 1960's is "the worst thing that has ever happened on the
planet",that solved (some) local problems only by exchanging them for
unprecedented, global-scale problems."

Despite the author's optimistic view, by the time I got to the finish, I
saw it more as an ode to things passing away than as an optimistic work
showing how humanity is working to save things. Yes, many humans are. More
are working to enrich themselves however possible, and those w/the most
power and least actual need to enrich themselves are doing this in the
worst possible way.

http://mojave-wolf.livejournal.com/30198.html#cutid1 (for review # 1, before I'd finished, concerned w/writing style as much as anything else)
http://mojave-wolf.livejournal.com/32485.html#cutid1 (once I'd finished, w/lots more detail, esp about the latter parts of the book)


Those three were way ahead of everything else, but also making my top 5:

4. Deep Economy, by Bill McKibben (edited from original review) Points out how traditional economics as taught and practiced in most places these days fails to account for all sorts of social and environmental costs, and towards a sort of economics that does these things. Also does a nice job of illustrating that there are all sorts of environmental damage beyoned global warming or even pollution and habitat destruction -- northern China as an example of the kind of catastrophe the whole world is going to face from diminishing water sources unless we get more responsible about our usage of this, amongst other things. And takes apart a lot of big agriculture propaganda against smaller or more localized farming.

I confess, some stuff in the book kinda rubbed me the wrong way -- while I
certainly agree we have a responsibility for each other, the emphasis on
community was a little too much for my anti-social taste, & I nearly quit reading when he said "the rest of this book is devoted to the economics of
neighborliness" (don't stop there, btw, the rest of the book is actually
really good); didn't care for his overall excessive cheeriness or his
repeated mentions of being a Sunday school teacher or his being way, way
way too kind in his evaluation of all sorts of people and arguments, but
then, this may be exactly the kind of person/book/argumentation most
likely to reach those people who still resist more
environmentally/socially friendly ways of life.


5. Infidel, by Ayaan Hirsi Ali A really gripping if sometimes problematic memoir. Don't always agree with her politics or her analysis, but nonetheless an extremely worthwhile read. For a longer take, http://mojave-wolf.livejournal.com/33707.html

For what it's worth, "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" would have made the list in the #4 spot, except I've heard people cast doubts as to its authenticity, and I haven't had time to check it out. Certainly, most of it rang true to me, but there was one point in particular where I wondered about embellishment, so holding off on ranking/reccing it for right now.

Fiction reviews (that will probably be a top 20, because I'm indecisive about narrowing things down) will hopefully finally show up tomorrow or Tuesday.
link5 comments|post comment

A Writer's Poll for Best Novel / Recs for some of you!/Esp Sitakali! [Sep. 15th, 2007|07:59 am]
[Tags|, , , , , , , , , , , ]

Okay, still only on the second page of catching up w/my f-list this morning, but have been inspired to post.

Two communities have a delightful story about monkey/pigeon friendship, and another has a discussion of modern libraries top 100 book list (apparently, the "reader votes" list has been taken over by scientologists and objectivists, two groups I find equally objectionable, as L Ron Hubbard and Ayn Rand claim 7 of the top ten spots, which sort of makes me want to despair for humanity and understand how Bush got reelected at the same time.)

The former, sweet/happy/heartwarming story leads me to recommend most heartily Evolving God by Barbara J King, the first half of which is mostly about empathy and social interaction among animals, especially apes (the premise of the book is that empathy is the root from which spirituality evolved, to oversimplify a lot). It also has some very beautifully written observations about spirituality and religion. From stalking your journals like a mad psycho, I suspect Elorie, Kyrialyse (I spelled your name right this time! woo!), Sitakali and Antarcticlust will find this particularly interesting for the religious discussion, and in addition those of you who are seriously into animals and animal behavior (and animal rights--the book isn't specifically arguing for those so much, but it's hard not to see it as advocating them whether it's trying to or not) will like it just as much for that. One of the rare books on religion that should manage to appeal to everyone from the more traditional theists to to the atheists on my f-list, and I think *all* of you like animals, so . . .

The book list reminded me of something I was going to post a while ago, but the site was down then. When stopping by the bookstore a while back, I found & perused The Top Ten: Writers Pick Their Favorite Books -- the summary from the site/jacket follows:

"The Top Ten" includes summaries of 544 books - each of which is considered to be among the 10 greatest books ever written by at least one leading writer (to see all the books mentioned, click the Books link at the left; click on Contributors to find the names of all the participating writers). In addition to each writer's Top Ten List, the book features Top Ten Lists tabulated from their picks, including:


The Top Ten Books of All Time
The Top Ten Books by Living Writers
The Top Ten Books of the 20th Century
The Top Ten Mysteries
The Top Ten Comedies


It also includes a top ten science fiction/fantasy/horror list. I can't endorse a lot of the sublists, I think that's because almost no mysteries or sf/f/h was listed, so something like "his dark materials" makes the top ten even tho I read the first book of that in january and it ain't even in contention for my "top 10 sf/f/h books I have read this year", and someone listed Tom Clancy, possibly as a joke, and I can't comprehend anyone listing Silence of the Lambs, either, but for the most part the whole thing is fascinating, and I already found a bunch of new authors to read simply because I like their lists. And there are essays by the writers, etc. I could write a new essay inspired by this book or something in it every day for the rest of the year, if I had time, which I don't, so rejoice!

I read 4 of the top 10, which goes up to five if having read *some* stories by Checkhov counts as having read a book of his stories, or 7 if having seen movies counts (Lolita & Anna Karennenna, which I can't remember how to spell), neither of which made me want to rush out and by the books, tho the descriptions here make me want to read them both, and I've been thinking I should read War & Peace *forever*, and just never got around to it -- I think it's cause when I think of Russian writers I think of "Notes from the Underground", and the idea of reading multi-thousand pages of that sort of misery (well-written misery, maybe brilliant misery, but not fun) doesn't appeal to me. Tho I gather Tolstoy is actually nothing like Dostoevsky (don't you guys love how I'm guessing at these spellings? and me wer inglish mager!) and I'm just being silly.

While only having one play in the top 10, Shakespeare got the most works receiving votes (shock!); Russian writers dominated the top 10 (shock!), only one woman in the top 10 (kinda sad, esp since the breakdown of writers voting seemed fairly gender-equal, at a glance, tho I didn't count), and, well, tons of good stuff there.

Anyway, the lists in question are here:

http://www.toptenbooks.net/

http://www.randomhouse.com/modernlibrary/100bestnovels.html

Last but not least, [info]sitakali, this book's for you!!! The Society of S, by Susan Hubbard. -- I dunno if it's any good, because I didn't check it out so I could focus on writing this weekend, but it's about a sect of vampire environmentalists who work for the promotion of better ethics and human rights. Ms Hubbard must have read your mind.
linkpost comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]

Advertisement